Entry bubble Banned: Flavored Cigarettes

By: Jess | October 01, 2009 | Category: Health


no smoking signLast week cigarettes with candy and clove flavors were banned in the United States as the first step in the new Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.

The reason for the ban was to get rid of flavored cigarettes, which may attract more kids and teens to begin smoking, leading to a lifelong habit. Companies that continue to ship the products in the country will be subject to punishment from the FDA. A phone number (1-877-CTP-1373) and website have been set up for people to report if they continue to see these products for sale.

I'm not a smoker, so this ban doesn't affect me on a personal level, but I want to know what you all think. Smoking is a personal issue for a lot of people, so please share your opinions on the new ban. (Please make sure to read our comment guidelines before doing so.)

| View Comments [16] | envelope E-mail This Entry | Tags: ban   cigarettes   jess   no_smoking   smoking  

Comments (16):

blue comment bubble Posted by doglover on October 01, 2009 at 09:30 AM EDT

Sorry I don't see the connection between candy cigarettes and regular cigarettes. Candy cigarettes have been around as long as I can remember and I have never heard one comment about them leading to a nicotine habit.

Comment Permalink

blue comment bubble Posted by Unknown on October 01, 2009 at 09:44 AM EDT

Hello Big Brother!

I'm thinking we may also need to ban sugar, since it is a cause for over eating in America. Of course, we should ban bicycles, because it can cause children to want motorcycles and you know how dangerous motorcycles are.

Do I need to go on?!

Comment Permalink

blue comment bubble Posted by Tom Pain on October 01, 2009 at 12:51 PM EDT

What about menthols--why aren't they banned? Statistics show that menthol smokers are younger than those who smoke 'regular' cigarettes.

Is it because American tobacco companies produce menthols?

If the government were genuinely concerned about the health of 'young people', it would ban sugary sodas & juice drinks, since more young people are obese than smoke.

Comment Permalink

blue comment bubble Posted by Regulating the sinners, and creating criminals on October 01, 2009 at 01:03 PM EDT

Regulating the sinners, and creating criminals.
The heroes, the Capones of the 21st-century

I sincerely believe that we need to discourage anyone from starting to smoke cigarettes in the first place. However, this new law or proclamation, will give the cartels, drug dealers, gangs, and the different forms of Mafia around the world incredible power; over millions of citizens, and local governments, in the United States. We have smokers in incredibly powerful positions everywhere in our local, county, state, and federal agencies.
The most powerful positions, are usually the lesser paid positions. That person, with their finger on the keyboard, that could easily release terabytes of personal data... for what? A case of his or her favorite flavored tobacco. Or that minimum wage security guard at the back door. Will he walk away for a few minutes, for couple cartons of his favorite cigarettes? The family smoking prevention and tobacco control act has very little to do with protecting a general public, but has a great deal to do with money, power and control. I cannot believe that the FDA could be this naïve. I cannot believe that the ATF isn't having a fit about this.

This new law will do very little to protect the health of US citizens. But it will do a great deal of damage in creating a new criminal; the tobacco runners. We've seen what happened with prohibition... and with today's technology and firepower available on the streets, it's not going to be pretty.

The electronic cigarette/cigar is probably one of the best ideas anyone has come up with in a very long time. The only reason for banning it, is the government hasn't figured out how to regulate or tax it. I agree that the cartridges coming out a foreign countries are extremely dangerous; loaded up with all kinds of poisons. But the cartridges for these electronic cigarettes/cigars that have been produced in the United States, have not been proven to be any more harmful than a cup of coffee. But the FDA did not test a single cartridge made in the USA. Or if they did, the results were not published or included in the study.

Oregon seen how popular the electronic cigarette/cigar was becoming; they couldn't figure out how to tax them; so under the cloak of protecting the public, the electronic cigarette/cigar/pipe was banned in Oregon. At the same time, Oregon's educational system would completely collapse if not for the sin taxes. Oregon's economy is highly dependent on the sinners, and smokers, the drinkers, just about anyone who wants to have a good time on Friday night.

My greatest concern, up and above a teenager picking up a cigarette, is a teenager that will grow up a criminal, joining a gang, a cartel, or the black market. These criminal organizations will be hailed as hero's, like the whiskey runners during the Prohibition of alcohol. The public's and/or our children's heroes will be killers; the tobacco runner/dealer.

All of this; this criminal activity, brought on by government control. Over a product, that can be made as safe as a cup of coffee, safer than breathing downtown at rush hour, safer than a shot of strong liquor, but not taxable at the moment. An electronic cigarette/cigar is not a cigarette or cigar, and would not fall under most of the local ordinance control bans, and/or tax laws. Not to mention, a lot of people will have to try and explain why there has been no decrease in lung cancer or heart failure.

Right now the data on tobacco caused illnesses are controlled by simply modifying definitions, policies, and protocols; when correlating the data. Ask anyone who has ever written a grant successfully. They will tell you right up front, that you must become an expert in manipulating the data to meet the criteria of the grant. And believe it or not, it's not illegal to do this. In fact it's almost considered an art, to paint elaborate mural, a million-dollar mural, by calling some leftover finger paints, a recyclable product. Amazing isn't it...

Tobacco products, as they are being sold today, are dangerous and highly addictive. Every time I see a teenager with one in their mouth I have an incredible urge to walk up and slap that cigarette right out of their mouth. But then again, that's what the FDA is doing, and I would probably be creating a criminal myself; by doing such a thing.

I really had to sound off about this, because I'm not a person that sits behind a desk and makes rules. I'm out there, with the people, watching them and listening to their conversations. I sit by the fountain downtown, and listen to the gang members laugh at these new laws, and brag about how much money they're going to make. They brag about how much power they will soon have... how easy it will be to recruit... and how easy it's going to be to divide the classes, orchestrate anarchy, and start creating their own little countries, with in our cities; bigger and more powerful than they have ever been.

Okay... so I'll shut up now...

Comment Permalink

blue comment bubble Posted by Karen on October 01, 2009 at 03:08 PM EDT

I can understand banning candy flavors. I don't understand the clove flavor ban. I'm 52 and while I still smoked (thank goodness that's over) I enjoyed the clove flavor. They are also preferred by many Indians who smoke. (East Indians, not Native Americans.)

Honestly, it would make a lot more sense to ban all tobacco products. The link with mortality and health care costs is undeniable, and not banning them, when far less dangerous substances are is hypocritical at best.

Comment Permalink

blue comment bubble Posted by Responding to dovlover on October 01, 2009 at 03:49 PM EDT

Hi, doglover. I noticed your comment and wanted to clarify. The ban is on cigarettes (real cigarettes) that have candy-flavored additives. So, the candy cigarettes you mentioned are still legal (Yes, I remember eating those as a kid and no I don't smoke today!)

Comment Permalink

blue comment bubble Posted by bob on October 01, 2009 at 04:08 PM EDT

I think tactics such as flavouring tobacco to appeal to children etc. is pretty dispicable. You're targeting an audience which is unprepared to understand the consequences of their decisions with a known hazardous substance.

Adults can make their own decisions, and pay the price for them, but candy cigarettes? I came across a website recently http://mesothelioma-lawsuits.info which talks about asbestos poisoning and the damage it can do. At the time the dangers of asbestos weren't known and many innocent people were harmed, but now we know the dangers of tobacco smoking - it makes sense to protect young people from being preyed upon by these vultures if at all possible.

Tobacco kills far more per year than asbestos ever will

Comment Permalink

blue comment bubble Posted by Jelleloqui on October 01, 2009 at 06:52 PM EDT

Try enforcing the laws that are already in place instead of penalizing adults that are supposedly free to decide for themselves.

Comment Permalink

blue comment bubble Posted by yvette on October 02, 2009 at 03:10 PM EDT

yeah i think it's a bad idea all around flavor cigarettes. exactly for the reasons stated children who love candy would be attracted to these dangerous products development a bad habit that could lead to death. we should be taken the world off of cigarette not making more products to encourage this bad habit for your health.

Comment Permalink

blue comment bubble Posted by Kim on October 03, 2009 at 10:17 AM EDT

I expect this won't make any difference.

All sorts of things tasted foul to me as a child, including cigarettes coffee and beer.

Comment Permalink

blue comment bubble Posted by s.l.b.w.l.p. on October 03, 2009 at 11:23 PM EDT

Our government is constantly walking the fine-line between protection and intrusion. Hobbes would say we willingly relinquish some rights in exchange for the guaranteed authoritative protection of others. I think our government develops through this back and forth nature tip-toeing of the line. I think the FDA just overstepped it on this one... They easily could have raised the age requirement for these, or all, tobacco products. If the human brain has "matured" enough by 21 for an individual to make reasonable decisions about alcohol, then perhaps that same individual can make reasonable decisions about tobacco use. I'm not sure of the consequences of this bill on specific sectors, or members, of the tobacco industry, but I think there has to be another explanation for such a drastic measure. There are clearly less-intrusive steps the FDA could take in cutting down on youth-cigarette usage. Furthermore, the FDA could have specifically banned certain types of packaging, labeling, etc. Again, I feel like the outcome they're going for could have been achieved through other means. I find the fact that it got enacted astounding.

Comment Permalink

blue comment bubble Posted by Tammie T on October 06, 2009 at 05:51 PM EDT

I just shake my head when I read about "silly" bills/laws like this. I am and will remain a smoker until I decide that I don't wish to anymore. I am also a veteran, I helped to ensure that we as Americans have the right to make choices for ourselves. We are all intelligent enough to make informed decisions, for ourselves. I don't need the government to step in and start telling me what I can eat, drink, watch, read....smoke. Flavors?? Who cares, they taste the same as regular cigs, just the filter is flavored. And children smoking, there are already laws in place to ensure that they are not sold to minors. Beef up those laws.

Any of us that smoke know that it is not good for us. It is also not good for us to drink to excess, it happens all over...be over weight, well here we are... Come on, we could go on for days about all that is unhealthy or dangerous for us.

Maybe enforcing and actually using properly what is already in place would be appropriate. The government needs to stop wasting my time, tax paying money and anything else attempting to "parent" me. I have wonderful parents and expect the government do perform as they were set up and elected to perform. Enough already!

Comment Permalink

blue comment bubble Posted by Chrissy on October 13, 2009 at 02:52 PM EDT

Just a few things....
1) I don't think that this ban is going to keep young kids from smoking. I started smoking at age 13 and smoked full flavored cigarettes until i was 18. I have since quit but do smoke a few times a year.
2) I think that if flavored cigarettes are going to be banned then why isn't menthol in the ban as well?
3) I think anyone who is legal able to smoke should be able to choose what type or flavor they would like to smoke. I am 30 and while i am not a "smoker" i do enjoy cloves.

Comment Permalink

blue comment bubble Posted by Patricia1985 on October 16, 2009 at 02:42 AM EDT

This post is nice.Cigarettes smoking is bad habbit,some times this habbit is spoil the body.Thanks for information.

Comment Permalink

blue comment bubble Posted by justencase on October 24, 2009 at 10:42 PM EDT

for the life of me who comes up with this ,who passed it,something else is going on behind this.a clove is an herb why is it not cigaretts across the board it is unfair and descriminating.let a person smoke what they choose let work a cure for breast cancer,aids,diebetes,anything but this,and yes i like the taste of clove get out my bussiness

Comment Permalink

blue comment bubble Posted by smokelesscigarettes on November 26, 2009 at 12:53 PM EST

What are your feelings on banning smokeless cigarettes? As a nonsmoker myself my biggest irritant is the smell of someone smoking. This solves that problem. The first I had heard of it was a site called smokelesscigarettesdirect

Comment Permalink